{"id":14154,"date":"2018-06-28T11:29:56","date_gmt":"2018-06-28T11:29:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dinnews.in\/?p=14154"},"modified":"2018-06-28T11:29:56","modified_gmt":"2018-06-28T11:29:56","slug":"apple-and-samsung-settle-lengthy-iphone-patent-battle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/?p=14154","title":{"rendered":"Apple and Samsung settle lengthy iPhone patent battle"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>San Francisco, Jun 28 (DIN NEWS)<\/b> Apple and Samsung have ended a years-long patent battle over copied iPhone design with an undisclosed settlement, according to a US court filing today.<\/p>\n<p>The world&#8217;s two biggest smartphone makers reached a truce in their seven-year-old court battle a month after a federal court jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple some 539 million for copying patented iPhone features.<\/p>\n<p>That award was seen as a victory for Apple, which had argued in court that design was essential to the iPhone.<\/p>\n<p>Financial terms of the settlement were not revealed and neither company elaborated on the brief court order which dismissed the litigation dating back to 2011.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Whereas the court has been advised by the parties that the above-entitled action has been settled, all remaining claims and counterclaims in this case are hereby dismissed with prejudice,&#8221; US District Court Judge Lucy Koh wrote.<\/p>\n<p>When contacted by AFP for comment, Apple referred to a statement released last month after the jury announced the damages award.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This case has always been about more than money,&#8221; the statement read.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It is important that we continue to protect the hard work and innovation of so many people at Apple.<\/p>\n<p>South Korea-based Samsung declined to comment.<\/p>\n<p>Apple&#8217;s lawsuit claimed Samsung, now the world&#8217;s biggest handset maker, copied the design and other features of the iPhone as the smartphone market was exploding.<\/p>\n<p>The case was keenly watched as a precedent for whether design is so important that it could actually be considered the &#8220;article of design&#8221; even in a product as complex as a smartphone.<\/p>\n<p>The case had been sent back to the district court following a Supreme Court decision to revisit an earlier 400 million damage award.<\/p>\n<p>The jury had been asked to determine whether design features at issue in the case are worth all profit made from Samsung smartphones that copied them &#8212; or whether those features are worth just a fraction because they are components.<\/p>\n<p>The three design patents in the case apply to the shape of the iPhone&#8217;s black screen with rounded edges and a bezel, and the rows of colorful icons displayed.<\/p>\n<p>Two utility patents also involved apply to &#8220;bounce-back&#8221; and &#8220;tap-to-zoom&#8221; functions.<\/p>\n<p>An original trial finding that Samsung violated Apple patents preceded a lengthy appellate dueling over whether design features such as rounded edges are worth all the money made from a phone.<\/p>\n<p>The retrial regarding damages was one element of a 548 million penalty &#8212; knocked down from an original 1 billion jury award &#8212; Samsung was ordered to pay for copying iPhone patents.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>San Francisco, Jun 28 (DIN NEWS) Apple and Samsung have ended a years-long patent battle over copied iPhone design with an undisclosed settlement, according to a US court filing today. The world&#8217;s two biggest smartphone makers reached a truce in their seven-year-old court battle a month after a federal court jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple some 539 million for copying patented iPhone features. That award was seen as a victory for Apple, which had argued in court that design was essential to the iPhone. Financial terms of the settlement&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":14155,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6,4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14154"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14154"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14154\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14156,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14154\/revisions\/14156"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/14155"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}