{"id":28208,"date":"2020-10-05T09:54:07","date_gmt":"2020-10-05T09:54:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dinnews.in\/?p=28208"},"modified":"2020-10-05T09:54:07","modified_gmt":"2020-10-05T09:54:07","slug":"hc-closes-arguments-on-kanganas-plea-reserves-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/?p=28208","title":{"rendered":"HC closes arguments on Kangana&#8217;s plea, reserves order"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Bombay High Court on Monday<\/p>\n<p>closed all arguments and reserved its verdict on the petition filed by actor Kangana Ranaut against the demolition of a part of her bungalow in Mumbai by the city civic body.<\/p>\n<p>A bench of Justices S J Kathawalla and R I Chagla conducted hearings on the plea last week before closing it for orders on Monday.<\/p>\n<p>Ranaut approached the high court September 9 after the demolition of a part of her bungalow in Pali Hill area here by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC).<\/p>\n<p>She had sought that the demolition be declared illegal and the court direct BMC to pay her Rs 2 crore as damages.<\/p>\n<p>Ranaut, through her counsel Dr Birendra Saraf, had alleged that the BMC carried out the demolition out of malice following a comment she made against the Mumbai Police that irked the Shiv Sena-led government in Maharashtra.<\/p>\n<p>She also cited an alleged threat given to her by Shiv Sena&#8217;s chief spokesperson Sanjay Raut in an interview.<\/p>\n<p>Saraf told the HC during previous hearings that the demolition was carried out on September 9, the same day as the interview.<\/p>\n<p>The BMC&#8217;s counsels, Anil Sakhre, Joel Carlos and Aspi Chinoy, had, however, denied the actor&#8217;s allegations.<\/p>\n<p>They said the BMC had simply been performing its statutory duty in demolishing such portions of the bungalow that Ranaut had altered illegally.<\/p>\n<p>In an affidavit filed through Carlos, the civic body alleged that despite making illegal structural changes, Ranaut had approached court for relief.<\/p>\n<p>This was an abuse of the process of law, the BMC said and urged the HC to dismiss her plea and impose a cost on her.<\/p>\n<p>Raut also told the court through his counsel Pradeep Thorat that the BMC&#8217;s action had nothing to do with his interview or any other comments made on Ranaut.<\/p>\n<p>During the previous hearings, the bench questioned the BMC&#8217;s swiftness in demolishing Ranaut&#8217;s property.<\/p>\n<p>It also stayed the demolition through an interim order and noted that had the BMC shown similar swiftness in all cases of illegal construction, Mumbai would have been a very different city.<\/p>\n<p>The court had also asked Raut if it befitted a parliamentarian to use ungraceful language against a citizen?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t you have any grace?&#8221; the HC asked after viewing a clip of the interview where Raut asked &#8220;what is law,&#8221; responding to a question on if he would take legal action against Ranaut for having compared Mumbai to PoK in a tweet.<\/p>\n<p>The HC on Monday also accepted written submissions from Dr Saraf and the BMC summing up their arguments before closing the matter for orders.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Bombay High Court on Monday closed all arguments and reserved its verdict on the petition filed by actor Kangana Ranaut against the demolition of a part of her bungalow in Mumbai by the city civic body. A bench of Justices S J Kathawalla and R I Chagla conducted hearings on the plea last week before closing it for orders on Monday. Ranaut approached the high court September 9 after the demolition of a part of her bungalow in Pali Hill area here by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC). She&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":28209,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28208"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=28208"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28208\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28210,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28208\/revisions\/28210"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/28209"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=28208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=28208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=28208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}