{"id":8478,"date":"2018-03-26T09:18:24","date_gmt":"2018-03-26T09:18:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dinnews.in\/?p=8478"},"modified":"2018-03-26T09:18:24","modified_gmt":"2018-03-26T09:18:24","slug":"sc-seeks-response-of-centre-on-pils-against-polygamy-nikah-halala","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/?p=8478","title":{"rendered":"SC seeks response of Centre on PILs against polygamy, nikah halala"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court today agreed to examine the constitutional validity of the prevalent practices of polygamy and &#8216;nikah halala&#8217; among Muslims and sought responses from the Centre and the Law Commission.<\/p>\n<p>A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra considered the submission that the previous five-judge constitution bench, in its 2017 verdict, had kept open the issue of polygamy and &#8216;nikah halala&#8217; while quashing triple talaq.<\/p>\n<p>Today, the bench, which also comprised Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, said a fresh five-judge constitution bench would be set up to deal with the constitutionality of &#8216;nikah halala&#8217; and polygamy.<\/p>\n<p>While polygamy allows a Muslim man to have four wives, &#8216;nikah halala&#8217; deals with the process in which a Muslim woman has to marry another person and get divorced from him before being allowed to marry her divorcee husband again.<\/p>\n<p>By a majority of 3:2, a five-judge constitution bench had earlier held triple talaq as unconstitutional in its judgement delivered last year.<\/p>\n<p>The bench was hearing at least three petitions including some PILs challenging the practices on various grounds including that they violate Right to Equality and gender justice.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court today agreed to examine the constitutional validity of the prevalent practices of polygamy and &#8216;nikah halala&#8217; among Muslims and sought responses from the Centre and the Law Commission. A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra considered the submission that the previous five-judge constitution bench, in its 2017 verdict, had kept open the issue of polygamy and &#8216;nikah halala&#8217; while quashing triple talaq. Today, the bench, which also comprised Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, said a fresh five-judge constitution bench would be set up&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8479,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[8,4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8478"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8478"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8478\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8480,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8478\/revisions\/8480"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/8479"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dinnews.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}